Case Name: General Electric Company v. Latin American Imports, S.A., d/b/a LATAM, et al.
Abstract: The court dismissed Latam's remaining promissory estoppel counter-claim because the promise GE allegedly made was not sufficiently definite to contradict the clear terms of the parties' contract and because Latam's alleged reliance on GE's alleged promise was not justified, as that promise was indefinite as to duration, transgressed the termination and integration (merger) clauses of the parties' written contract, and was inconsistent with another term of that contract.